Industry experts say the policy or the waste no longer necessary to lead foreign

Posted on 9/10/2014 4:00:53 PM

The new National Development and Reform Commission Industry Annual Coordination Division Yong in 2014 China Automotive Industry Development Area (TEDA) International Forum revealed that the National Development and Reform Commission is studying, so that the law covers the whole process of the automotive industry life cycle.
"This means that the future law will become an important means for the government to guide the orderly development of the automotive industry, and before some of the non-legal aspects of the policy will be abandoned, many of the policies or management mechanisms will exit the automotive industry." State Information Center, Information Resources Xu Changming, director believes that if this change come true, the domestic auto industry will face a no small change.
In fact, before the official start of the forum, innovation and reform issues related to the automotive industry has been a hot car industry representatives on the previous day closed-door summit. Among them, the auto industry policy should not modify, investment access policy should not let go, how to develop their own brands and other industry topic of concern, became the focus of the day closed-door summit discussions.
Doubts about the fate of industrial policy
If you follow in Yong said, the future of the automobile industry macro management will move toward legalized, then had a decade-long existence of the "Automobile Industry Development Policy" (hereinafter: industrial policy) there is no need to exist, is undoubtedly a worthy car the industry explore the topic.
In the closed-door summit, the China International Economic and Exchange Center, executive vice president Zheng Xinli it forthrightly that now revised industrial policy should be to time.
In his opinion, there is a lack of industrial policy three points: First, in formulating did not think China's rapid development of private cars can not create a good environment for the car into the family, so when traffic jams become a social problem, the policy in passive market being led by the nose; Second is that the policy on the automotive industry efforts to encourage innovation is not enough; Third, the policy does not use China's huge auto market to cultivate their own brand cars.
"Now it is necessary under the new situation and new tasks to revise the policy." Zheng Xinli believes that the policy of the amendment should include prominent independent innovation, and encourage new energy vehicles and automotive exports, especially to mobilize state-owned enterprise development initiative own brand vehicles. "State-owned enterprises own brand cars did not develop, this is the largest one in the past industrial policy mistakes."
As policy makers and the automobile industry, one of the perpetrators, the former State Development and Reform Commission Chen Bin Industrial Coordination Division, has believed in 2004 the number of industrial policies have been put in, only auto industry policy has been implemented, its important reasons the policy behind the legislation is based on certification, a "directory" in restraint of it.
"Industrial policy in the past is in the industrial investment projects entering the market access and directory management, they should approach with administrative regulations, strengthen matter, after regulators." Bin said at the closed-door summit, a dozen years ago that managed by administrative regulations proposed adding a standard way, but has not supported. And now, the government reform industrial management, change management for the automotive industry provided an opportunity.
In fact, since the Third Plenary Session of the Party's eighth deepening reform of China's full deployment, issues related to the future development of the automobile industry has been in discussion. In Yong said, the core of the future development of the automobile industry on two things: First, the comprehensive deepening of reform; One car to go macro-management, management of road walking legalization.
"This means that the auto industry could disappear policy does exist." In Yong, said the fate of the policy issues under discussion. If it persists should support their own brands to accomplish something, otherwise it would lose its meaning.
Open access several steps to go?
In addition to the abolition of industrial policy issues related to the automotive industry should not let go of investment management to discuss access, in a closed-door summit is also hotly debated.
In fact, the state promulgated a series of policies to support new energy vehicle after it was raised in the industry, whether it be open investment access in the field of new energy vehicles, in order to promote the rapid development of the industry. For this proposal, one of the policy makers who are in favor of Chen Bin, but not to the full liberalization of the traditional auto industry, he has been very tangled.
"What is the purpose of release? Insufficient competition in the automotive industry? We need to be open to further competition? If not, we have to let go and let go of it? This is something I've been thinking about but can not figure out, I think some things can go step by step, at least at home, I can personally recommend the first release of new energy vehicles. "
In this regard, Chen Bin reason is that the core components of new energy automotive batteries, motors, electrical control is not good at the automotive industry, while other industries are no cars qualification, nor capable electric car, so he had to report to their superiors raised several times, you can consider appropriate release outside the automotive industry, but it must be conditional.
For the traditional automotive sector, Bin favor the proposal to go step by step, first commercial open field, and then a passenger. "Now the level of development of Chinese commercial vehicle market can fully satisfy consumer demand, so we do not need to worry about in the commercial release to a certain extent, after the implementation period of time, you can open the passenger, but to avoid a domestic auto companies coax the sky, I do not agree with a foreign similar products that do not release more than two, then if you want to dry one, you can exit from the original one, and then re-dry one, this idea that we can investigate. "
Now a joint policy on the issue should be revised, the industry view is very uniform. Zheng Xinli believes that a joint policy should not change, is not the key issue, the most critical change is to start from the industrial policy, the development of state-owned enterprises to mobilize the enthusiasm of its own brand cars, to encourage independent research and development.
In this regard, Zhao Hang, director of the China Automotive Technology and Research Center, in an interview with 21st Century Business Herald reporter interview that the joint venture can not make long-term renewal of the plant construction continues indefinitely, otherwise its own brand market space will be a joint venture annexation.
"For my country, the market is the most important resource, we want to make good use of it before, we do not market to develop the market, but now is not the case. Market does not return the core technology, the engine is still not self-produced, common technology as a whole level is not high, less competitive, so now we have no need to attract foreign investment, because we have no shortage of funds, but rather the lack of technology, and therefore should be properly open market, in order to ensure their own brands and joint venture brands to competing against. "
According to the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers statistics, the current market share of own-brand cars have declined for 11 consecutive months. Zhao Hang believes that if the market share continues to go down, the whole industry will be a problem, he suggested that relevant departments should introduce policies for joint ventures now due not to renew, in order to ensure a competitive market, but also allows a joint venture car prices retain twelve factories.
"At the national policy must be left to its own brand certain market space, so as to support twelve independent car companies to grow and develop." Zhao Hang said to give its own brand of special channels.

Post a comment

Hello guest, care to post a comment?